Why no dialogue with Maoists

How many more CRPF Jawans will become cannon fodder for a flawed LWE Policy?

Yet another dastardly blast by the Maoists of Bastar and 7 precious lives of our CRPF Jawans blown to smithereens. It’s a matter of grave concern for all of us that a problem which is essentially of a socio- economic nature, is being callously addressed as a law & order problem. The Govt. of Chhattisgarh claims that hundreds of Maoists have surrendered and are demoralized because of action by our para-military forces. But the gruesome facts speak otherwise. It is the CRPF and the police which has been at the receiving end of all of violence and counter violence. There has been no report of any of the enquiry commissions set up by the government since 6thapril 2010 when 76 jawans were brutally ambushed in
Dantewada –Bastar. Why is government not making public if these reports are there? What happened to the Darbha killing report by the NIA when some congress leaders were killed.

The moot question is; are our jawans sitting ducks for Maoist fire? Are they simple cannon fodder for a huge scam in the name of operation against LWE(Left Wing Extremism)? Have our governments developed a vested interest in keeping the problem alive and not tackling it through dialogue with LWE. If we can dialogue with Pakistan  in spite of their attack on our air base in Pathankot and even invite JIT from Pakistan to join investigation, why no dialogue is being initiated with Maoists?.

 

Swami Agnivesh on Godhra Kand 27th March 2016

Around two lakh Muslims gathered at a Jamiat Ulema-I-Hind conference in Godhra where prominent community leaders and social activist Swami Agnivesh Spoke about the growing “insecurity” in the country and also rejected the “need for a certificate” of nationalism amid raging political debate over the issue of “Bharat mata ki jai”.
 
For full speech click on.

To Read Full Artical Click Here

They (BJP and RSS) want to give us a certificate based on whether we say Bharat mata ki jai or not. Why should we chant Bharat mata ki jai? What is the jai that you are saying? (Vijay) Mallya ki jai? A liquor trader who has duped the country of thousands of crores and decamped. What were Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Prime Minister Narendra Modi thinking when they knew that the Kingfisher trader has Rs 9,000 crore bank loan? Why hasn’t he been charged with sedition and called anti-national? You book a JNU student leader Kanhaiya for sedition. What is happening in this country.

देश में हिंसा और असहनशीलता एक बड़ी चुनौती

देश में धार्मिक कट्टरता और असहनशीलता की प्रवृत्ति अचानक ही पैदा नहीं हुयी अपितु इस की जड़ें हमारे पिछले राजनीतिक इतिहास में हैं। इस देश पर लम्बे समय तक शासन करने वाली कांग्रेस पार्टी ने वोट बैंक की राजनीति को आगे बढ़ाते हुए विवादास्पद बाबरी मस्जिद के ताले खुलवा दिए थे और इसके निकट ही मंदिर की नींव का पत्थर भी रखवा दिया था। 

कांग्रेस की इस तरह की साम्प्रदायिक और वोट बैंक की राजनीति का ही दुष्परिणाम है कि आज भाजपा और उससे संबंधित अन्य संगठन भी साम्प्रदायिकता के आधार पर वोट बैंक की राजनीति को आगे बढ़ा रहे हैं जिससे देश में असहनशीलता और भहसक प्रवृत्ति बढ़ रही है। 

प्रधानमंत्री नरेन्द्र मोदी को चाहिए कि जो भी साम्प्रदायिकता की बात कहते हुए देश छोडऩे की बात करते हैं, उन्हें पार्टी से निकाला जाए।

अब देशभक्ति का सर्टिफिकेट आर0 एस0 एस0 बांट रही है

1925 में आरएसएस का गठन हुआ था और 1947 तक किस आरएसएस के वर्कर ने देश के लिए शहादत दी है। उन्होंने कहा अब देशभक्ति का सर्टिफिकेट आरएसएस बांट रही है, जबकि अतीत गवाह कि आरएसएस के कई लोगों ने आजादी से पहले देशभक्ति नहीं गद्दारी की थी। वह दो शिक्षा संस्थानोें में मुख्य वक्ता के तौर पर जालंधर आए हुए थे और बाद में पत्रकारों से बातचीत कर रहे थे।

 देश को संघ ने पूरी तरह से बांटकर रख दिया है। धार्मिक कट्टरवाद फैलाया जा रहा है। बनारस हिंदू यूनिवर्सिटी, हैदराबाद यूनिवर्सिटी, इलाहाबाद विश्वविद्यालय, जेएनयू पर संघ कब्जा करना चाहता है। राम मंदिर के नाम पर आरएसएस व भाजपा दोनों लोगों को गुमराह कर रही है।

 संघ की सोच व कार्यशैली ने आर्य समाज को खोखला कर दिया है। संघ को ऐसा लगता है कि जो जाति देश में पैदा हुई, वह देश भक्त है और जो जाति विदेशों से आई उनकी देशभक्ति संदिग्ध है। उन्होंने कहा जिस रास्ते पर चलकर कांग्रेस धर्म व जातपात की राजनीति करती आई है, उसी रास्ते पर अब मोदी सरकार व आरएसएस चल रही है।

News Artical In शनिवार, 26 मार्च 2016 जालंधर

To Read Full Artical Click Here

 

बी0 डी0 आर्य गर्ल्स कॉलेज में वासुदेव कुटुम्बकम विषय पर सेमीनार

डाउट नहीं करोगे तो भेड़चाल वाली भेड़ बनकर रह जाओगे

अंधविश्वास मत करो। सवाल करो। 3 डी यानी डाउट, डिबेट और डाइसैट को अपने जीवन में अपनाओ। अगर आप डाउट नहीं करते तो आप भेड़़ है। क्योंकि भेड ही दूसरी भेड़ों की पीछे चलती है। क्योंकि उसके पास अपना दिमाग नहीं है। किसी को भी अपना गुरु धारण मत करो स्वयं अपने गुरु बनो। कहा, आज मनुष्य के अंदर जितनी भी बीमारियां है इनका कारण अहंकार है।

कहा हम भगवान को रोज रिश्वत देते है कि हमारा यह काम करवा दो हम यह चढ़ावा देंगे। डाकू भी मंदिर जाते है और भगवान को कहते है कि वह भी लूटे गए धन का 10 प्रतिशत हिस्सा मंदिर को देंगे। कहा, हम सबने ईश्वर को विकृत बना रखा है । ईश्वर तो सब को एक समान पैदा करता है। जब हम पैदा होते हो तो सब इंसान होते है कोई जाति नहीं होती किसी धर्म का ठप्पा नहीं लगा होता सब एक समान होते है हम उसे कहते है ‘तुम हिंदू हो ऐसे पूजा करो, ऐसे नमाज पढ़ो। सारे मनुष्य मिलकर उस छोटे बच्चे या इंसान को हिंदू, सिख, मुसलमान बनाते है।

 

  

आर्य समाज में किसी भी काम की शुरुआत मंत्रोंं से करते है जबकि हम उन मंत्रो का अर्थ नहीं जानते या सही अर्थ नहीं समझ पाते यह सबसे बड़ी विडंबना यह है कि हम उन मंत्रों के अर्थ पूछते भी नहीं।

 

News Artical In Dainik Bhasker 27th March 2016 Jalandhar

To Read The Artical Clik Here

  

 

 

Press Statement on Modi Govt’s refusal of Visa to US Commission on Religious Freedom

New Delhi

09th March,2016

I fully support Modi Government’s refusal of Visa to US Commission on International Religious freedom ( USCIRF). This was in line with the earlier UPA government’s policy all these past years.

Disappointment of the Obama Government is understandable but totally unreasonable. Did they ever take stock of Religious Freedom in their allied countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan? Why does US need to play the role of ‘big brother’?

As citizens of India, we have our unfettered constitutional rights to fight against all forms of unfreedom including religious bigotry and fundamentalism. I have even supported the J.N.U. S.U. demand to scrap colonial IPC section 124 A on sedition which was grossly abused by the British then and by our governments now. We have a proud long ‘Sanatan’ tradition of Shashtrarth – fierce polemical religious debates. Today masses enjoy and empower themselves through such debates on television and on social media. Violent intolerance is largely condemned across the board.

Just as Muslims or other progressive forces in India do not need RSS certificates of Nationalism, India as a whole does not need US certification of Religious Freedom. Instead the US commission should focus internally on ensuring more equality and freedom for  American blacks, hispanics and minors in prisons etc.

As a footnote, I want to record that couple of years ago, the same US Commission had invited me to depose in US but I had flatly declined.

Male Dominated 'Place of Worship ' are infact, place where god doesn't reside.

I am afraid the women of our country are getting it wrong. Temple entry has nothing to do with the right to pray. Equality with men, in all respects other than limited biological functions like childbirth, is a fundamental right of all women. There is no question that subjecting women to discrimination is a crime and a shame. It deserves to be denounced.
But equating the “right to pray” with temple entry is a different matter altogether. It is like equating entry, say, into somebody’s bedroom with the right to breathe — for air is also present in bedrooms.
The right to pray cannot be separated from two basic questions: Who are we praying to? What does it mean to pray? If it is to god that we are praying, it does not have to be done in a temple. Temple, kitchen and marketplace are all alike in respect of god’s presence. Men may be irrational enough to believe that god lives in only their temples and that they have a monopoly over such a god. That is why they are, quite rightly, worried about women entering their temples. They are right to worry that if women are allowed into these structures of make-believe, serious harm could come to their gods. The reason is that women are feared to be more rational. Rational creatures will know only too soon that omnipresent god does not stay confined to man-made temples.
If it is to the genuine god that we wish to pray, do we really have to go to a temple, church, mosque or gurdwara? Do we have to go to Bethlehem or Mecca to drink water or brush our teeth? Can’t these be done anywhere? Why is praying any different? No human being, male or female, with a modicum of commonsense should pray to a god who is imprisoned in a man-made structure. A god who is man’s slave is a poor, pathetic god indeed.
Now, what is prayer or worship? All religions are utterly corrupted by the domination of man. Religions, as feminists quite rightly lament, are patriarchal. But religion of this kind is the ghost of a religion, and not its true form. Guru Nanak did not have to pray in a temple. Prophet Muhammad was not enlightened in a temple, but on a mountain. The purpose of prayer is to attain the strength to lead a godly life. It is an insult to women to assume that they can receive it only from manmade temples with which god has nothing to do. Women should know that not only they but god is also not allowed in these temples and mosques.
Being denied entry into certain temples or mosques, therefore, is not a spiritual issue. It is only a legal issue. That so-called “places of worship” are man-dominated and seats of discrimination must open their eyes to the fact that these are places where god is routinely mocked. Practising discrimination in the name of god is the worst form of irreligion. A place where this is done has nothing to do with god or spirituality. Why do you want to waste your time and money there? I am sure that the women in this country have better sense than that.
The core issue today is not temple entry for women. It is the liberation of god from the pious prisons we have created for the divine. It is because god is confined to these quaint and funny places that the fear of god does not operate elsewhere. That is the curse of our country. If only we recognised the omnipresent god who is with us in our workplaces, in our relationships, in our marketplaces, this country would have been free from corruption, caste violence and systemic oppression. By creating man-dominated places of worship, we confine god to convenient spots and claim the rest of the country to practise corruption, injustice, violence and oppression.
Why did Gandhi give up on temples? Was it not because of his spiritual enlightenment? Which embodiment of spiritual light has ever associated temples or mosques with god? Who can claim that he has become a better human being because of a temple? It is a shame that even in the 21st century, we have not taken leave of superstition and obscurantism. The time has come for us to allow the light of reason into our religious life. God is light, not darkness.
 To Read More Go to This Link:-------
http://epaper.indianexpress.com/713561/Indian-Express/06-February-2016#page/14

Swami Agnivesh